Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose fuzzy argumentation frameworks as a conservative extension of traditional argumentation frameworks[6]. The fuzzy approach enriches the expressive power of the classical argumentation model by allowing to represent the relative strength of the attack relationships between arguments, as well as the degree to which arguments are accepted. Furthermore, we explore the relationship with fuzzy answer set programming, more in particular the correspondence between the stable extensions of a fuzzy argumentation framework and the fuzzy models of an associated program.
منابع مشابه
Gödel Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
In this paper we combine fuzzy set theory and argumentation to facilitate the use of fuzzy arguments and attacks. Unlike many existing approaches, our work does not require the use of any parameters, bringing it closer to Dung’s work in spirit. We begin by introducing Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks, and specialise them using the Gödel t-norm. We then examine this framework’s properties and show...
متن کاملA logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties
In the last decade defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning. The logic programming paradigm has shown to be particularly useful for developing different argument-based frameworks on the basis of different variants of logic programming which incorporate defeasible rules. Most of such frameworks, however, are unable...
متن کاملSome properties of Janssen's Fuzzy Argumentation Frameworks
The majority of approaches to abstract argumentation with fuzziness yield some number as part of the computation process, which is then compared to some threshold in order to determine which arguments should appear in an extension. However, identifying such a threshold is difficult, and a more natural approach therefore involves representing the extension as a fuzzy set of arguments. Such an ap...
متن کاملA Logic Programming Framework for Possibilistic Argumentation with Vague Knowledge
Defeasible argumentation frameworks have evolved to become a sound setting to formalize commonsense, qualitative reasoning from incomplete and potentially inconsistent knowledge. Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) is a defeasible argumentation formalism based on an extension of logic programming. Although DeLP has been successfully integrated in a number of different real-world applications, D...
متن کاملFuzzy Labeling for Abstract Argumentation: An Empirical Evaluation
Argumentation frameworks have to be evaluated with respect to argumentation semantics to compute the set(s) of accepted arguments. In a previous approach, we proposed a fuzzy labeling algorithm for computing the (fuzzy) set of acceptable arguments, when the sources of the arguments in the argumentation framework are only partially trusted. The convergence of the algorithm was proved, and the co...
متن کامل